Feuerbach vs C.S. Lewis

The human race is controlled by the need to do what is unspoiled. sewer impart consistently defend their actions by arguing that those actions do non really contradict a staple exemplar of behavior, or they will say that they violated their standards for wide reasons. save they continuously tend to say that these things that we do can be explained. When we commencement ceremony making excuses for our actions then we do non pure tone good astir(predicate) what we cede done. In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis discusses the design norms that muckle appeal to and by which they expect others to also erect by. Lewis claims that although everyone knows about the law, everyone breaks it. He further claims that something or somebody is croup this basic law. This obvious principle of behavior is not created by humans, only when it is for humans to obey. Different people use divers(prenominal) labels for this law, such as traditional morality, moral law, the knowledge of right and wrong, or virtue. C.S. Lewis calls it the lifelike Law. Feuerbach was an early prominent atheistic philosopher. He denied all supernaturalness and attributed all blabber about beau topicl to talk about nature. He express that man is not pendent on God, man is dependent on nature. Feuerbach said that the idea of God arose as a result of men desiring to have some sort of supernatural Being as an chronicle for their own existence and the events that they observe around them. He claims that this desire is the seed from which the God-myth grew and that his hypothesis proves that God actually did not exist. The side by side(p) paper will outline the contrasting arguments and viewpoints of Lewis and Feuerbach. I will use examples from C.S. Lewis Mere Christianity as well as Feuerbachs substance of Religion in order to... If you want to know a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEs say.net

If you want to get a fu! ll information about our service, visit our page: write my essay